Join Pakistan Navy As Sailor Apply Online Registration Latest Advertisement (S) Batch A-2017 How to Apply for Pakistan Navy Sailor Jobs 2016 Under Batch A-2017

Vacancies /Posts for Pak Navy Sailor Jobs

 Sailors for different Trades A-2017 (S) Batch
Technical
Mariners
How to Apply:

Interested candidates willing to Join Pak Navy are  required to register themselves online through the Official Pak Navy website www.joinpaknavy.gov.pk or from the nearest Selection Centres of Pak Navy.

The applicants are required to bring the Postal Order of Rs. 100/ at the time of interview in favor of Director Recruitment Naval Headquarter Islamabad or crossed postal order will be accepted if brought and submitted by hand.

Recruitement Procedure:-

First of all uou have to Apply Online or Visit Nearest Pak Navy Recruitment Centre.
Then there will be written Exam on 23 October 2016 at 8.00AM in Intelligence Test & Subject Test.
on 10 Novermber 2016 Pak Navy Official website will announce results.
After That there will be physical assesment Test
After that there will be medical Test & Interviw starting from 11 November to 30 november 2016.
After that step there will be a personality test and will be seleted temperory before final Medical Test.
At the last candidates will be tested in Naval Medical Checking Center karachi and those who are completley fit will selected as final candidates for A-2016 Sailir Batch.
Eligibility Criteria/Basic Requirements:-

Gender/Martial Status: Only Unmarried males are eligible to apply.

Nationality/Citizenship: Only Pakistani nationality holders are eligle to apply.

Educational Requirement for Technical Branch:

If any Pakistani wanted to join the Pak Navy Technical branch so the education requirement has Matric in Science with 65% marks in the examination.

Educational Requirement for Marine Branch:

The eligibility criteria for Joining this branch is also same as Matric in Science/Arts but with 60% marks is required.

Height & Age Limit for Technical Branch:

Height of the males should be “5 feet 4 Inch” (162.5cm) & Age of the applicants should be 16 to 20 years.

Height & Age Limit For Marine Branch:

Fir this branch the height should be “5 feet 6 Inch” (167.5cm) & Age of the applicants should be 17 to 21 years.

Important Date to Remember:-

Start of Registration:- 25 September 2016

Last Date for Registration apply:- 10 October 2016

Pakistan Navy has announced its Recent induction / Recruitment Program for Join Pakistan Navy as Sailor 2016 Batch A-2017 Online Registration Technical & Marine Branch Latest Advertisement . Pakistan Navy is one of Pakistan three armed forces which are known for bravery for nation’s Defence. Various vacancies induction program has started for A-2017 Sailor Batch i.e( Technical & Mariners) So every Pakistani unmarried males are eligible to apply for these Navy Jobs.The qualification required for these induction program is Matric. The Latest Advertisement of Join Pakistan Navy as Sailor 2016 (S) Batch A-2017 Online Registration Technical & Marine Branch will Publish in Sunday Newspapers on 25 September 2016.

COAS witnesses Pak Army's operational readiness at Mangla

The visit was paid in the wake of late raising strains crosswise over LoC

RAWALPINDI (Dunya News) – Chief of Army Staff General Raheel Sharif went to central station of Strike Corps at Mangla in the wake of the progressing heightening pressures over the outskirts.

As per Dunya News, COAS checked on the operational readiness of the military amid his visit.

Between Services Public Relations (ISPR) affirmed that General Raheel Sharif was joined by Chief of Logistics, Director General Military Operations and the corps officers of Lahore, Gujranwala and Peshawar amid his visit to central station of Strike Corps at Mangla.

The motivation behind this visit was to audit the operational readiness in the wake of late escalating tensions crosswise over LoC furthermore the Indian war fever being built up after Uri Attack.

Additionally, the late episodes of cross-fringe terminating were likewise the explanation for the visit some way or another.

COAS and corps commandants were advised by Commander Central Command and Director General Military Operations at the meeting.

General Raheel Sharif communicated his complete fulfillment over the operational readiness of Pakistan Army.

In the interim, the Indian government is additionally taking their words back about the surgical strike and is by all accounts on back foot over the issue.

Surgical strikes: The inquiries that still remain

So murky has the security diversion amongst India and Pakistan get to be over the previous week that even John Nash and Thomas Harsanyi would battle to comprehend the rising lattice of probabilities and settlements. 

Conventionally, India's 'surgical strikes' against fear based oppressor take off platforms over the Line of Control ought to have prompted irate challenges from Pakistan and the danger, if not the starting of retaliatory activity. Rather, Pakistan denies it has been assaulted and has been transporting in remote correspondents to the LoC to brace its point. 

Fear based oppression and surgical strikes are no giggling matter yet Pakistani columnist Gul Bukhari best summed up the Catch-22 in which the two nations – and their publics – get themselves today:

To this ‘riddle wrapped in an enigma, inside a mystery’, I would add another paradox: Pakistan denies any Indian forces crossed the Line of Control as part of the surgical strikes India says it launched, yet it has in its custody an Indian soldier. And India, which says it launched the strikes – but which has officially refrained from saying whether the strikes involved soldiers crossing the LoC – insists the soldier in Pakistani custody crossed the LoC inadvertently. This situation has created a delicious irony: The only way for Pakistan to stick to its stand that there was no Indian attack is to accept the Indian claim – that the jawan indeed crossed over by mistake.

Four days after India’s sensational announcement about conducting surgical strikes, the sheer parsimony of its statement has allowed all sorts of unverified and fanciful stories to swirl around the media.

To be clear, all that the Indian director general of military operations, Lt Gen Ranbir Singh, actually said on the record on September 29 is that surgical strikes were launched against terrorist launching pads across the Line of Control, causing “heavy casualties”. Since then, the only other bit of information put out on the record – by junior information minister Rajyavardhan Rathore – is that contrary to ‘sourced’ reports, no helicopters were used to cross the LoC, and that there were no aerial strikes. On his part, however, the DGMO did not mention the number of targets or the number of casualties, nor did he identify them. Nor were any details provided of what the surgical strikes consisted of – whether special forces crossed over – as the Indian media has surmised, based on briefings from ‘sources’ who will not go on the record – or whether conventional targeted firing using mortars was used.

No compromise to security

Why has the government not officially released this harmless but important information in the public domain? One possible reason is the fear that the more specific details it provides, the harder it becomes for the Pakistani army to credibly claim there were no Indian strikes – thus making retaliatory action more or less inevitable. But if that were the concern, what is the reason behind the planting of hyperbolic reports on the Indian media? Surely the government knows this too will fuel the retaliatory impulse across the border.

Previous Indian border crossings were never publicised because they had the limited objective of raising the tactical cost to Pakistan of its transgressions – such as the beheading of an Indian soldier in January 2013. The army then took a call that the message from its action would go across even without publicity, and without triggering the pressure for further escalation. Today, however, the government has chosen to go public with the broad claim – but judging from the response across the border, it is not clear that its message has gone across.

What about national security considerations? Could that be the reason for the government’s reluctance to part with more details about the operation? Well, assuming the Indian army did indeed strike seven locations across the LoC, those locations are obviously not a secret to either the terrorist groups who were targeted or the Pakistani army, which keeps tracks of these groups and protects them. So there can be no justification for withholding the specific coordinates of the seven targets. How the government came to identify the locations ought not to be disclosed if intelligence capabilities are revealed as a result but making public the locations hit and providing a description of the nature of the target does not in any way compromise India’s security or intelligence gathering capabilities. Remember: Pakistan already has that information.

Similarly, there is no reason for the Indian government to withhold its precise estimate and assessment of the ensuing casualties at each of these locations since this information is also known to the Pakistani side. If Indian special forces neutralised 10 Lashkar-e-Tayyaba terrorists at a particular location, for example, the LeT bosses and their Pakistani military handlers already know this. So this information can also be easily made public.

Since the Pakistani side knows full well what methods India used to strike at each of the locations – special forces, firing across the LoC, or a combination of the two – sharing this information with the Indian public does not compromise any security or intelligence capabilities on the Indian side.

To the extent to which video footage exists, some of it may well be considered sensitive so I do not consider the release of such footage as necessary. In any case, showing footage without revealing the locations targeted will be of little value.

The irony is that instead of making public those details about the operation that are already known to Pakistan, the government is leaking information that the Pakistani army and the terrorist groups targeted there may not know and perhaps ought not to know. Some news reports have appeared in India identifying the specific units that were involved in the surgical strikes. The fact that commandos were flown by helicopter up to the LoC just before they went across seems to me another operational detail that need not have been shared.

Nip cynicism in the bud

So if the DGMO’s secrecy is not driven by the fear of provoking Pakistani retaliation, and if, as we saw above, there is no security-related reason to withhold basic data about the operation, why has the government chosen to batten down the information hatch?

Could it be that the targets hit were not particularly significant from a military standpoint, as Ajai Shukla has argued? In which case, has a political calculation been made that going public with this fact may reduce the ‘benefit’, if any, that may accrue to the ruling party as the next round of elections approaches? In a Facebook Live episode I did with The Wire‘s readers a couple of days ago, I was surprised at the number of people who asked questions along those lines. My own advice to them was: please put your cynicism on hold.

Although the government has made exaggerated claims about its actions in the past – in the ‘terror boat’ incident from February 2015, for example – the fact that the surgical strikes happened inside easily accessible, populated Pakistan-controlled territory and not on the high seas makes it improbable that the operation did not occur, as Islamabad claims. Even if the locations hit were small “targets of opportunity” – something the Indian army has gone after in the past as well – the fact that the government went public still marks a paradigm shift in the way the country deals with terror threats. It’s a different matter that the new paradigm may not be any more effective than the old one in furthering India’s strategic objective of reducing– and then ending – the threat of terrorism emanating from across the border.

For now, however, it is time for the government to be more forthcoming about the September 29 surgical strikes. At a minimum, it should make public the information that Pakistan already has.

India, Pakistan exchange fire at LoC's Bhimber sector

ISLAMABAD: Incidents of cross-fringe terminating over the Line of Control (LoC) proceed as Pakistani and Indian troops traded fire in the Bhimber part in the small hours of Tuesday.

The Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) said in an announcement that Indian troops "turned to unwarranted terminating" at 4am while the trading of flame went on for two hours.

"Pakistani troops befittingly reacted to unwarranted Indian terminating in the Baghsar, Broh and Khanjar territories in Bhimber area," ISPR said.

No death toll has been accounted for from either side.

On Monday, three separate occurrences of cross-fringe terminating were accounted for in the Nezapir and Kailer areas and Iftikharabad, a town in Azad Kashmir.

Ties amongst Pakistan and India compounded after an assault on an Indian military camp in Uri inside India-held Kashmir on Sept 18, where around 20 Indian officers were executed.

India asserted that Pakistan-supported psychological oppressors were included in the assault and at first guaranteed that weapons recuperated from them bore Pakistani markings. In any case, this statement was exposed by the Indian media itself, compelling the Indian DGMO to withdraw the case.

From that point forward, trade of flame has occurred along the LoC on a regular routine. The heightening proceeded when India asserted it completed "surgical strikes" over the control line on Sept 29, claims Pakistan rejected as being unjustifiable.

Pak-US joint military activity 'Motivated Gambit' finishes up

Pakistan and United States joint military activity "Motivated Gambit" has finished up in South Carolina, USA, Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) said Thursday.

As per the tweets by DG ISPR, Lt - Gen Asim Bajwa, nine-day long execrise expected to picked up from each other experiecne in the space of counter-psychological oppression and counter IED operations.

Asim Bajwa said that Pak Army SSG and Aviation troops took an interest in the joint activity